Jump to content


Photo

WiFi and Amtrak: Missed Connections


31 replies to this topic

#1 transit54

transit54

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,382 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burlington, VT

Posted 30 May 2012 - 04:16 PM

NY Times is running a piece highlighting passenger difficulties with WiFi. Amtrak says improvements should be in place by the end of the year.

http://travel.nytime...s.html?src=dayp
31,357 miles on Amtrak to date, 42% on the Vermonter

#2 AutoTrDvr

AutoTrDvr

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2012 - 04:48 PM

NY Times is running a piece highlighting passenger difficulties with WiFi. Amtrak says improvements should be in place by the end of the year.

http://travel.nytime...s.html?src=dayp


I gather that it's only available on the Acela at present??? I'd love to have it on the AT, but that's probably way too much wishful thinking, and too difficult logistics wise, along the CSX route.

#3 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 30 May 2012 - 05:20 PM

I gather that it's only available on the Acela at present??? I'd love to have it on the AT, but that's probably way too much wishful thinking, and too difficult logistics wise, along the CSX route.

WiFi is available on the following trains listed on the website. Well, its available until several hundred other people try to use it at the same time and when the nearest cell phone towers can handle the data load from a passing train.

In the past several years, Amtrak has added WiFi to the Acela, the Amfleet I coach and café cars, the Surfliners in CA, the Talgos on the Cascades corridor. WiFi equipment has not yet been added to the Amfleet II, Superliner, and Horizon cars. There was a item in an Amtrak report about adding WiFi to the AutoTrain lounge cars, but that apparently has not happened yet.

#4 leemell

leemell

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,089 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 30 May 2012 - 05:56 PM


I gather that it's only available on the Acela at present??? I'd love to have it on the AT, but that's probably way too much wishful thinking, and too difficult logistics wise, along the CSX route.

WiFi is available on the following trains listed on the website. Well, its available until several hundred other people try to use it at the same time and when the nearest cell phone towers can handle the data load from a passing train.

In the past several years, Amtrak has added WiFi to the Acela, the Amfleet I coach and café cars, the Surfliners in CA, the Talgos on the Cascades corridor. WiFi equipment has not yet been added to the Amfleet II, Superliner, and Horizon cars. There was a item in an Amtrak report about adding WiFi to the AutoTrain lounge cars, but that apparently has not happened yet.


Coast Starlight has WiFi.

#5 amamba

amamba

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,884 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Providence

Posted 30 May 2012 - 07:32 PM

I have consistently posted on this forum with my disappointment with the amtrak wifi service. I understand the limitations that the trains face, but to me it is a problem of expectations, as the article mentions. Amtrak has heavily marketed their wifi which is so slow as to be unusable. I do much better on my iPhone with the 3G connection than attempting to use the wifi.

And the wifi did not work on the Coast Starlight when I rode it last year.

I actually find the wifi to be quite good on the regional in October, but I was sitting in the cafe car and it was before the hard launch. I think it was only good because I was in the cafe/lounge and not that many folks were using it.

#6 AutoTrDvr

AutoTrDvr

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2012 - 08:03 PM


I gather that it's only available on the Acela at present??? I'd love to have it on the AT, but that's probably way too much wishful thinking, and too difficult logistics wise, along the CSX route.

WiFi is available on the following trains listed on the website. Well, its available until several hundred other people try to use it at the same time and when the nearest cell phone towers can handle the data load from a passing train.

In the past several years, Amtrak has added WiFi to the Acela, the Amfleet I coach and café cars, the Surfliners in CA, the Talgos on the Cascades corridor. WiFi equipment has not yet been added to the Amfleet II, Superliner, and Horizon cars. There was a item in an Amtrak report about adding WiFi to the AutoTrain lounge cars, but that apparently has not happened yet.


I don't know if it would be possible to have WiFi on the entire Auto Train route. If it's the same dependence as my cell/Blackberry (Verizon 3G), then there are a lot of gaps along the way. And it's not reliable if it can fade out on you en-route. I would imagine some new towers would have to be installed, at great expense.

Probably not profitable in the long run. Unless the "snowbirds" start to get interested in WiFi, I doubt it will happen on the Auto Train.

#7 Donctor

Donctor

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,125 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:BTV

Posted 30 May 2012 - 08:21 PM

And the wifi did not work on the Coast Starlight when I rode it last year.


It worked for me for about half the trip.
Posted Image

#8 gatelouse

gatelouse

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 445 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2012 - 08:28 PM

Auto Train appeared to be testing it out last winter. There was signal in the lounge. It didn't work well at the time--connection would come to a halt when passing through some rural areas.
Ridden, now gone: 3 Rivers 10/6 sleeper; SL East; Pennsy to CHI; Superliner Card; Shoreliner sleeper; Heritage Adirondack; Metroclub; NE Direct inland NHV-SPG-BOS

#9 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,393 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:16 PM

As a rule, I've found that the Wi-Fi works pretty well in Virginia...but then again, down here we're not fighting with a thousand other people on trains between DC and Philly for those connections.
Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)
Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)
Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#10 AutoTrDvr

AutoTrDvr

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:17 PM

Auto Train appeared to be testing it out last winter. There was signal in the lounge. It didn't work well at the time--connection would come to a halt when passing through some rural areas.


Precisely. -_-

#11 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:47 PM

I don't know if it would be possible to have WiFi on the entire Auto Train route. If it's the same dependence as my cell/Blackberry (Verizon 3G), then there are a lot of gaps along the way. And it's not reliable if it can fade out on you en-route. I would imagine some new towers would have to be installed, at great expense.

Probably not profitable in the long run. Unless the "snowbirds" start to get interested in WiFi, I doubt it will happen on the Auto Train.

One partial solution for cell phone coverage, is have the server in the cafe cars access multiple vendors; Verizon, AT&T. So if the train is passing through a dead area for Verizon, use AT&T if it there is a signal. This will only go so far, as the trains on tracks well away from the major roads are likely to be passing through poor cell coverage areas.

Amtrak will have to add WiFi to all of its trains to compete, including the AutoTrain. The funds to add WiFi to the remainder of the fleet is in the FY2013 budget, but the preliminary FY13 capital budget will get cut when Congress pass (if it passes) the FY13 budget. Remains to be seen if more WiFi systems will be installed in FY13.

#12 AlanB

AlanB

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,233 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, New York

Posted 30 May 2012 - 11:43 PM


I don't know if it would be possible to have WiFi on the entire Auto Train route. If it's the same dependence as my cell/Blackberry (Verizon 3G), then there are a lot of gaps along the way. And it's not reliable if it can fade out on you en-route. I would imagine some new towers would have to be installed, at great expense.

Probably not profitable in the long run. Unless the "snowbirds" start to get interested in WiFi, I doubt it will happen on the Auto Train.


One partial solution for cell phone coverage, is have the server in the cafe cars access multiple vendors; Verizon, AT&T. So if the train is passing through a dead area for Verizon, use AT&T if it there is a signal. This will only go so far, as the trains on tracks well away from the major roads are likely to be passing through poor cell coverage areas.


That's exactly what does happen, the system is setup with cards from all the major carriers. And it moves between the cards that at any given moment have the strongest signal. This while never providing 100% continuous coverage, will probably work for a large majority of Amtrak's LD trains. The biggest problems are see are the Coast Starlight in Oregon, the Zephyr in the Rockies, the Cardinal in New River Gorge, and a large part of the Empire Builder's route.

And the Auto Train did run a test in the lounge cars a bit over a year ago now, IIRC. I'm not sure just what they discovered and/or decided from that test. However, to my knowledge, at least for now that system is gone. I'm not sure if that's the same system that is now in use on the Acela & the Regionals.
Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#13 johnny.menhennet

johnny.menhennet

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,433 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Solana Beach, CA
  • Interests:taekwondo, geography, current events, speech and debate, TRAINS

Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:12 AM

The wifi on the Pacific Surfliner is actually decent. By no means great or even good, but bearable. I imagine that that's the case, though, only in the cafe car, as it probably gets worse as you travel away.

From the article, I'm not quite certain that the Acela makes up 25% of ridership on Amtrak.. Seems like a number that so many of these reporters throw out there out of laziness to actually check facts.
Amtrak: Pacific Surfliner (100000000000), Southwest Chief (5), California Zephyr (1), Coast Starlight (6), Capitol Corridor (1), Empire Builder (2), Acela Express (1), LSL (1), NE Regional (2)
Non-Amtrak: NCTD Coaster (at least 20), Metrolink (4), SD Trolley (at least 20), LACMTA Red Line (at least 50), Seattle Streetcar (1), Chicago 'L' (probably 13), NYC Subway (probably 15), WMATA Mass Transit (probably 20), LIRR (1), Las Vegas Monorail (at least 12), MBTA Mass Transit (16), NJ Transit commuter rail (3), I'm sure there are more that I can't think of right now

upcoming Amtrak: Pacific Surfliner (10000000000 more),
upcoming non-Amtrak: Coaster, Red Line/Expo Line in LA

Pretty good for a 16 year old :)

#14 Guest_X_*

Guest_X_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:41 AM

Just to be clear, the Coast Starlight Wi-Fi is provided by a different vendor than the one that does all the other trains.

#15 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,585 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas, USA

Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:58 AM

The system is setup with cards from all the major carriers. And it moves between the cards that at any given moment have the strongest signal. This while never providing 100% continuous coverage, will probably work for a large majority of Amtrak's LD trains.

We're talking about hundreds of passengers per train here, many of whom already have some sort of wireless device ready to fire up should a usable signal ever arrive. Does each train have dozens of separate access points on each of the major networks to give the users a fighting chance of a useful signal? I have tried every major carrier (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile) along the Sunset Limited route and received little or no service no matter the card or provider. So far as I can tell it's not even close to being ready for dozens or possibly hundreds of users at once and there is little incentive for the network carriers to install more towers for trains that run once a day at most and only once every few days in the case of Union Pacific's Sunset Route.

Any views expressed are my own and do not represent the views of my employer, parent companies, partners, or subsidiaries.

Over 50,000 people just like you recently signed a petition to expand high speed passenger rail in the United States of America.

Long live The Coast Starlight, The California Zephyr, The Empire Builder, The Southwest Chief, and The Canadian.


#16 Guest_X_*

Guest_X_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2012 - 01:03 AM


The system is setup with cards from all the major carriers. And it moves between the cards that at any given moment have the strongest signal. This while never providing 100% continuous coverage, will probably work for a large majority of Amtrak's LD trains.

We're talking about hundreds of passengers per train here, many of whom already have some sort of wireless device ready to fire up should a usable signal ever arrive. Does each train have dozens of separate access points on each of the major networks to give the users a fighting chance of a useful signal? I have tried every major carrier (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile) along the Sunset Limited route and received little or no service no matter the card or provider. So far as I can tell it's not even close to being ready for dozens or possibly hundreds of users at once and there is little incentive for the network carriers to install more towers for trains that run once a day at most and only once every few days in the case of Union Pacific's Sunset Route.


The CCJPA (Capitol Corridor) has an excellent high-level description of how the system works on their website:

LINK

#17 Cho Cho Charlie

Cho Cho Charlie

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,123 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near an Amtrak station
  • Interests:Trains, Starships

Posted 31 May 2012 - 06:03 AM

I have consistently posted on this forum with my disappointment with the amtrak wifi service. I understand the limitations that the trains face, but to me it is a problem of expectations, as the article mentions. Amtrak has heavily marketed their wifi which is so slow as to be unusable. I do much better on my iPhone with the 3G connection than attempting to use the wifi.


Yep. WiFi on a moving LD train is simply an unworkable idea.

This is a good example that sometimes a company should ignore customer requests because even though they sound reasonable on the surface, they are just plain bad ideas. And as in this case, something a company can't possibly achieve "on the cheap".
Me

Proud supporter of the Trails to Rails program.

#18 bmorechris

bmorechris

    Train Attendant

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 48 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore, MD
  • Interests:Trains, local transportation history, mechanical/marine engineering, travel

Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:12 AM

I had pretty good luck with the WIFI on a sold out 161 (w/ an extra coach, so likely 500+ passengers) this past Monday. I saw probably 20% of my car at any one time using wireless devices, whether they were all using the Amtrakconnect WIFI or not I can't confirm. I was able to surf the web and use google maps no problem. A guy across the aisle from me was streaming a Netflix movie, and he did have some trouble with it stalling, but he did get through the whole movie. One thing to consider is that more and more people are going to try to connect to the WIFI because most wireless carriers are doing away with unlimited data plans, people are going to want to conserve that by connecting to WIFI whenever they can.

#19 mulveyr

mulveyr

    Train Attendant

  • Training
  • Pip
  • 18 posts

Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:56 AM

I have to wonder how long this will ultimately be a problem. Carriers are slowly but surely moving towards data plans that allow you to have multiple devices attached to a single account, so you'll no longer need one plan for your phone, another for your tablet, etc.

And with the move to 4G, WiFi is horribly slow anyhow. ;-) I generally get around 12-4Mb/sec on my Droid Razr Max on 4G, which is insanely faster than any public WiFi network you're likely to find. As it gets rolled out to more areas and added to more devices, it would make little sense for people to compete for the limited bandwidth and area coverage of most WiFi networks.

#20 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 31 May 2012 - 08:26 AM

From the article, I'm not quite certain that the Acela makes up 25% of ridership on Amtrak.. Seems like a number that so many of these reporters throw out there out of laziness to actually check facts.

The Acela provides 25% of Amtrak's ticket revenue while carrying around 11% of the total passengers. The Acela with 3.38 million passengers in FY2011 accounted for around 31% of the passengers traveling between endpoints on the NEC, so that is not the source of the 25% number. The reporter was stating what the Amtrak spokesman said. Since it was not a direct quote, the reported either messed up summarizing what was said or the Amtrak representative mis-spoke.



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users