Everydaymatters
Engineer
When high speed rail was first announced for Illinois, I thought it was a good thing. Now that a lot of the track work has been completed, I've found out things that make me wonder if it was worth the expense.
First, I thought the high speed rail would permit Acela-type trains to run between Chicago and Springfield. Now I'm hearing it allows the regular Lincoln Service trains to increase their speed to 110 MPH.
I've been reading it shaves only 10 minutes off the trip from Chicago to Springfield. Ten minutes just isn't worth the money spent. The difference between traveling 79 mph and 110 mph results in only 10 minutes saved?
Are there other benefits to all the work has been done? Were the tracks in such desparate condition that they had to be rebuilt?
I'm having a hard time trying to wrap my head around the justification for spending such a large sum of money for high speed rail that really isn't very high speed after all.
First, I thought the high speed rail would permit Acela-type trains to run between Chicago and Springfield. Now I'm hearing it allows the regular Lincoln Service trains to increase their speed to 110 MPH.
I've been reading it shaves only 10 minutes off the trip from Chicago to Springfield. Ten minutes just isn't worth the money spent. The difference between traveling 79 mph and 110 mph results in only 10 minutes saved?
Are there other benefits to all the work has been done? Were the tracks in such desparate condition that they had to be rebuilt?
I'm having a hard time trying to wrap my head around the justification for spending such a large sum of money for high speed rail that really isn't very high speed after all.